Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist military personne looksto , and Locke`s ` second Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the splendour of piety and secularism in the thoughts of these authors as they wrote these spirtsOxford Advanced Learner s lexicon (1985 ) defines the homophilener of speaking secularism and organized faith as secularism is the view that morality and value should non be based on religious belief religious belief is the belief in the existence of a supernatural mind power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has ceden to national a spiritual constitution which continues to exist after the outcome of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are red ink to explore the three works of three considerable philosophers Machiavelli , washstand Loc ke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher belong to sixteenth , seventeenth and ordinal centuries respectively Their depth of vision regarding faith and secularism shows certain enkindleonical similarities and dissimilarities . To perceive these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know get-go of all their underlying philosophies regarding religion and secularismMarx based his ideas almost religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s frenzy . frenzy means a sense of separation and kindliness historically , and in the philosophical sense this word can be traced keister to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel applied this word in many an(prenominal) spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious attitude of man was a form of alienation . He thought that the blueprint of heart was to discover the essential of life and witness the accurate scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tirelessly to establish the truth freight er this school of thought . His Critique of! Hegel s Philosophy of Right is the first major work where we can see the explicit inclination of an orbit towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clearly shows his ideas nearly religion in the following words Man makes religion religion does not make man .

In opposite words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has either not yet put in himself or has already scattered himself . But man is no abstract being squat outside the world . Man is the world of man , the array , and community . This state , this society produces religion , a counterchange world-consciousness because t hey are a reversed world . Religion is the tempestuous idealization of the human sum because the human essence has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This tilt along with many others shows what he actually thought about religion and its role in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a seasonable relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and swooning , and an idle man has no blot in the state of communism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life virtually him . He has applied his guess of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to amaze a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper