What is Theology? Is perfection a logical subject for scientific culture? How does doubting Thomas use dialectic to seek this perplexity? Does Aquinas use Platonic or Aristotelian ism to look for this issue? Does the nub of god channel as the power in which faith is macrocosm performed changes? Should it? What would Tillich enjoin? Do you agree? Theology is delimit as the study of a god or gods from a religious perspective. The record book divinity fudge is derived from the Greek words theos, which is translated as divinity, and logos which is translated as reason or word. matinee idol is a sensible subject for scientific study because ethical motive is a cognition. However, theology is not the same type of skill as geometry and arithmetic; theology is the type of science that [begins] from premise accepted from a superior body of knowledge (69). It is the consequence type of science because it takes principles that are known from a higher(prenominal) bo dy of knowledge. Therefore, if theology is a science, and theology is the study of God, accordingly God has to be valid subject for scientific study. To explore this issue Aquinas uses dialectic to logically prove that God is a valid subject.
He also uses Aristotelian philosophical system: St. Thomas describes theology as a science in the sense defined by Aristotle. The theological truth of yesterday is defended as an set in stone message against the theological truth of today and tomorrow. Therefore the message of theology does not change as the situation in which theology is being performed changes. It should not change because if the message were to be! relevant, it must say to the individual or group, no guinea pig what the situation is. Tillich would say that the message would stay the same so off the beaten track(predicate) if the situation changes; I would agree with him.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment